Less is more… Stop imitating the Disney/Pixar style

AI-Stopimitating

A lot of people think that the best style for an animation film is the style that Disney and Pixar have established and mastered over the years. And true, their films often come close to perfection and are an example of excellent craftsmanship, but animation has so much more to offer… or shall I say, less to offer… Reduction is a powerful tool to make your animation stronger. Not every film needs the fluid motions of a Disney masterpiece, not every CG picture needs realistic light bounces and waxy skin shaders of a Pixar blockbuster.

Every country in the world except the US (and maybe Japan) seem to have severe difficulties building up their animation feature film business. At least in Germany part of the reason is that the investors expect a Pixar or Disney look, which is easy for said studios to do with budget above $100 million, but in Germany studios can be glad if they can scrape together $10 million. And you know what… some of those actually almost look like a Pixar film with fur and water and crowds and what not:

Teaserplakat-Konferenz-der-Tiere

You never heard of this film called “Animals United”? That’s because instead of watching this film you could do things that are more fun… like an endoscopy. I could rant for hours about what is wrong about this movie and this way of movie making, but let’s focus on this: Their primary goal was to create a successful movie, so they stole the look and some characters from other animated features. They ended up with a movie that played okay in the German theaters, but soon will be forgotten forever. No heart, no soul, many talents wasted years of their time. I was so angry after watching this.

Now look at this:

SidToyStory

Doesn’t this look horribly bad compared to nowadays? Neither the character nor the background look anywhere near as pretty as anything in “Animals United”, but Toy story 1 is a classic, one of the greatest animated films of all time (and this is not because it was a milestone in CG history). Why is that? Because the story is so great, you don’t care how it looks – even if you watch it today! The story (or at least some kind of point) is the most important aspect of a film – not the style.

Okay, my argumentation is a little wild because I compare old Pixar with recent Pixar, but I think you get my point. A good film doesn’t have to fulfill all the recent beauty standards, to be good. And now we get to the main point of the article. It’s good news that a film doesn’t have to look like whatever insane sum Hollywood can afford. It can be extremely beneficial if you no longer (more or less successfully) copy a style, but come up with a new one. A reduced, affordable one that supports your point. You will have more time to develop the aspects that you actually want to spend time on.

Deciding what you don’t need can be much more powerful, than deciding what you do need to have in your film. It not about the absence of something, it’s more about the power of a condensed selection. If you only left over what needs to be there, your film will leave a better (and, for you as a filmmaker, a more controllable) impact.

If you realize you only need very simple stick figures to tell your tale, you don’t have to set up a complicated skin shader and you can use that time to improve posing and timing. Maybe you know some of the highly entertaining Flash shorts by Bruno Bozzetto. The “characters” often consist out of simple shapes and the timing, music and sound design sell it (like this one) – that’s all he needs. Yes you could do this in a Pixar style, but you really don’t need to.

Yes-No-Bruno-Bozzetto-466x275

Also think about TV shows like South Park where it is not at all about a high-end look, but a very reduced style that fits the dialog-focused and sometimes very gross humor that you really wouldn’t want to see any other way.

“But these are example of short animations”, I hear you think. And I have to admit, for some reason people rather make a poor Pixar imitation than to create an original style for their feature film, but it has been done. The animated feature “The Secret of Kells”, tells a story all around the creation of the holy book of Kells. And because it’s centered on said book, the design of the film looks like it could be illustrations pulled straight from it.

Kells-Pic-1

Medival celtic and irish drawing styles influence, no, determine the look and feel. Big no-nos like tangents are part of the design and it all fits together perfectly with the quite decent story. Yes it’s not super-smooth Pixar, but isn’t this just as appealing and even more interesting?

I want to end with an example of how far you can pull the reduction. This music video for the song “Splitting the Atom” by Massive Attacks sets most of the elements that normal animation has aside. Very reduced color palette, mostly low-poly mechs, no cuts and… a lack of actual animation. Nothing except the camera moves.

Vimeo

By loading the video, you agree to Vimeos's privacy policy.
Learn more

Load video

Massive Attack – Splitting the Atom directed by Edouard Salier from Edouard Salier on Vimeo.

And I don’t know about you, but this thing blows my mind every time – and I think it’s not just because of the music. It’s because for their “story” it was the best way of telling. Hah, isn’t it amazing how this thing has a story? How you want to know where the camera is heading and later wonder what’s going on?

I hope I could give you some motivation to think outside the box. This has nothing to do with being more artsy and less mainstream, but with finding your own style or an style that fits to what you want to tell…

What do you think about this? Is the Pixar/Disney bar the one that you want to reach every time? Do you know other films that successfully did their very own thing? I would be very happy if you join the discussion and leave a comment.

27
Leave a Reply

avatar
22 Comment threads
5 Thread replies
1 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
24 Comment authors
GeorgesarahJordan SCarolina M.herrec Recent comment authors
  Subscribe  
newest oldest most voted
Notify of
Olubunmi john
Member

But animation-wise…isn’t it beneficial to mimic the great disney way of animation…you know the fluid character movements…judging from the examples you gave (south park) or even family guy,these are cartoons that most traditional animators consider as ‘shame to animation’…even the american animators use to label the japanese anime ‘lazy animation’…though i agree with the fact that you can tell a story even with stick figure animation…but i believe someone that wants to enjoy the ‘wrath'(challenges) of animation won’t stick with a stick-style non-challenging animation…but if this article is referring to someone that wants to go into feature movie..fine! Its good… Read more »

Sabina K
Guest
Sabina K

Great article! I was thinking about this a lot lately. The audience’s expectations are high, because of pixar and other known companies, but that doesn’t mean all animated movies need to look the way pixar does them. Each movie that is set in different universe needs to have it’s original and characteristic art style. Like the little triangle nostrils in Madagascar. I loved that. Those are little things that really make a movie stand out from the others.

alessandrocchipinti
Member
alessandrocchipinti

I definitely agree with your pint of view! I’m a great fun of Disney/Pixar’s style, but I accept that the story is the unique powerful heart of a film. The style is only a partner. Of course, an important partner, but it isn’t the king. Story is the King.
John Lasseter always remember us this important lesson.

Great article, congrats! 😉

Gesù
Guest
Gesù

Hi Ferdinand, it was about time that some other one (except me I mean) say these kind of things to the people.
I’d like to suggest to everybody the author Nina Paley: she made her own feature film by herself (!!!) using flash and it’s called “Sita sings the blues”. I saw this movie in Annecy some years ago on the big screen and it was awesome. She selfproduced it so if I’m not wrong you can google it and find it easily.
See you!

jeffO
Guest
jeffO

But I love that style lol!!

Good post I really liked it. I think everyone should go their own path!

Josh K
Guest
Josh K

Decades and decades of blood and sweat went into developing the Disney/Pixar style. It’s main source of inspiration was real life. That’s why it’s so highly regarded. It should be the very goal of every animator.

You’re saying people should reinvent the wheel.

Philip V
Guest
Philip V

Great, great post. It seems that right now is the time for some studio to come forward with a different approach. Just like Tex Avery did (with Chuck Jones and Clampett) to “rebel” against the Disney style. Not because it is a bad style but because its healthy for the art of animation. It is interesting that Glen Keane who just recently left Disney wrote in his resignation letter “that animation really is the ultimate art form of our time with endless new territories to explore. I can’t resist it’s siren call to step out and discover them.” {Letter is… Read more »

Clem
Guest
Clem

WOW Philip V that was amazing and almost a post in and of itself!!

Woolie G.
Guest
Woolie G.

The problem with any immatation is that you never really grow your own style and if you don’t have a style you have nothing. So many kids on Deviant Art are spending all their time making stupid my little pony garbage or whatever and they will never get any better at actual art and they have a million other kids telling them they are great when really they are not at all.

カ アウ
Guest
カ アウ

Totally and 100% agree.

a.t.v.
Guest
a.t.v.

I like Pixar’s style much more than Disney. It looks nicer.

Barry
Guest
Barry

I would like the likes of Blue Sky and Dream Works to be the one stopping intimating the Disney style. Did you ever notice how cookie cutter their films feel? Its like they can’t think on their own and everything ends up being plastic. So bad.

Jordy
Guest
Jordy

Now Frozen will be the new thing and everything will look like it. Mark my words.

Michael L.
Guest
Michael L.

I hate that the industry has become nothing but copycats. It’s like grow some creative braincells people!

sam
Guest
sam

dude this just inspired a post of my own, thanks

Maxoid
Guest
Maxoid

It is a form of flattery that we imitate anyone so Pixar should be flattered. 😛

Marcus
Guest
Marcus

More people need to treat 3D like they used to with 2D where they are trying new things! Then I think that 3D animation will surpass all other artforms. It has that potential!

herrec
Guest
herrec

Pixar copied their style from other places too so it isn’t originl.

Carolina M.
Guest
Carolina M.

The best way to learn something is to copy it. So while you are learning it pays benefits to imitate the styles of the artists you most enjoy. Disney and Pixar are the greatest artists in the animation industry and make the most sense to imitate.

Jordan S
Guest
Jordan S

ONE WORD: BOXTROLLS. Go see it and support not-Disney-style movies. It’s amazballs.

sarah
Guest
sarah

i agree that experimentation is important, creativity will die without some breathing room. it’s mostly about preferences really, i like all sorts of animation from all sorts of sources, there are many very beautifully animated japanese anime films, also studio ghibli is amazing! all of those movies are tops and i watch them again and again. howls moving castle being one of my very favorites along with princess mononoke. but the thing is, like you said it’s all about the story, or the characters. even if the show is geared towards children, if it’s well done i will watch it.… Read more »

George
Guest
George

Sure there are a lot of animated films that are original in terms of style and storytelling. The most surprising one was Minions, which told the story of some comedic sidekicks in a toughing and funny way and it did cost less than the average Hollywood Animated Film. Also Illumination seems to be the only company who realizes that other studios apart from Pixar and Disney could adapt a visual style for all of their movies. It makes you comfortable. Doesn’t seem that all of the animated studios should do it, though.